# Alignerr vs DataAnnotation: advertised pay

Alignerr advertises a median top rate of $75/hr (typical $50–$120/hr, highest $400/hr) across 67 distinct advertised rates in 627 live listings, as of 2026-10-13.

DataAnnotation publishes too few distinct rates for a median (highest advertised $150/hr), as of 2026-10-13.

| | Alignerr | DataAnnotation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Median top rate | $75/hr | not published |
| Typical band | $50–$120/hr | not published |
| Highest rate | $400/hr | not published |
| Distinct advertised rates | 67 | 4 |
| Live roles | 627 | 112 |

These two cannot be compared on a single figure: only Alignerr publishes enough distinct rates to measure.

Rated elsewhere, other sites' scores with their counts, never part of the pay figures:

- Alignerr: Glassdoor 2.3/5 (25 reviews), Trustpilot 4.6/5 (2,805 reviews).
- DataAnnotation: Glassdoor 4.0/5 (644 reviews), Trustpilot 3.9/5 (1,961 reviews).

---

Source: AIPayList (https://aipaylist.com/compare/alignerr-vs-dataannotation)
Observed: 2026-10-13
Licence: CC BY 4.0. Reuse freely with a link to the source URL.
Method: rates are read from each platform's own public job feed. One vote per unique platform+rate band, counted at the top of the band (the most the role says it can pay). Per-task pay is never converted to hourly. No benchmark is published below 5 distinct advertised rates. Population: since 2026-08-26 a role must advertise at least $10/hr (or $10 per task) to be listed, so these figures describe listed roles rather than all AI work; lower-paid rating work exists and is not represented. Full rules: https://aipaylist.com/methodology