Head to head · 2026-08-23
Mercor vs RWS TrainAI: what each one actually pays
Mercor advertises a median of $78/hr across 139 distinct advertised rates; RWS TrainAI advertises a median of $11/hr across 14 distinct advertised rates. Read from each platform's own listings on 2026-08-23.
Mercor
- median verified
- $78/hr
- typical band
- $44–$110/hr
- top verified
- $250/hr
- distinct rates
- 139
- live roles
- 433
RWS TrainAI
- median verified
- $11/hr
- typical band
- $7–$17/hr
- top verified
- $20/hr
- distinct rates
- 14
- live roles
- 66
What each side excludes
- Mercor: no “up to” ceilings in its live listings — every published rate is concrete. 9 pay per task and are never converted to hourly. 4 publish no pay at all.
- RWS TrainAI: no “up to” ceilings in its live listings — every published rate is concrete. 2 publish no pay at all.
What Mercor hires for
- Domain experts136
- Other AI work94
- Multilingual & translation88
- Coding & software eval55
Most country-specific roles: United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Netherlands · 80 worldwide-remote
What RWS TrainAI hires for
- Multilingual & translation34
- Voice & audio18
- Other AI work10
- Data annotation2
Most country-specific roles: India, United States, Brazil, South Korea, Malaysia · 2 worldwide-remote
Best-paid live roles on each
Mercor
RWS TrainAI
No listings with a verifiable hourly rate right now.
Which suits you
- ▪ On advertised pay alone, Mercor is ahead: $78/hr median against $11/hr, from 139 and 14 distinct rates respectively.
- ▪ On volume, Mercor has more live roles right now (433 vs 66), which matters more than a headline rate if you need a queue that stays full.
- ▪ Rates here are what platforms advertise, not what you will earn: task availability, unpaid onboarding and review time all cut the effective hourly. How we measure.