TuringCoding & software eval
Pod lead - Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering (Terminal Bench Science)
Pay not published
About this role, in Turing's words
We are seeking an experienced Mechanical or Aerospace Engineering expert to lead a team of technical trainers developing realistic, terminal-based engineering tasks for a frontier AI training and evaluation initiative.
What you'll do
- Lead and mentor a pod of technical trainers, ensuring consistent quality, productivity, and timely delivery of engineering tasks.
- Review engineering tasks end to end, including problem statements, geometry and mesh files, simulation inputs, material properties, reference solutions, and automated tests.
- Validate tasks involving finite-element analysis (FEA), computational fluid dynamics (CFD), thermodynamics, heat transfer, dynamics, robotics, flight simulation, propulsion, and orbital mechanics .
Show all 10 itemsHide the other 7 in What you'll do
- Ensure tasks reflect realistic mechanical and aerospace engineering workflows and require meaningful multi-step technical reasoning.
- Verify engineering correctness across units, equilibrium, conservation laws, boundary conditions, mesh convergence, solver tolerances, reference frames, and numerical stability.
- Validate computational environments, simulation tools, solvers, and dependencies to ensure reproducible results.
- Review automated graders to ensure they evaluate meaningful engineering outputs such as stresses, deflections, natural frequencies, aerodynamic coefficients, thermal performance, orbital parameters, and safety margins.
- Identify technical inaccuracies, unrealistic assumptions, incorrect tolerances, and opportunities to bypass engineering calculations or simulations.
- Provide clear, actionable technical feedback, track revisions, and ensure quality issues are resolved before task approval.
- Onboard trainers, allocate work, monitor quality and throughput, escalate blockers, and maintain technical documentation and best practices.
Candidate background
What we're looking for
- Ph.D., postdoctoral experience, or equivalent advanced technical experience in Mechanical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, or a closely related discipline.
- Strong programming skills in Python, C/C++, Fortran, Julia, or MATLAB/Octave , with proficiency in Linux environments.
- Hands-on expertise in at least one major area: FEA, CFD, dynamics, flight simulation, thermal modeling, astrodynamics, guidance, navigation and control (GNC), or propulsion modeling .
- Strong understanding of engineering simulation, numerical methods, computational modeling, and technical validation.
- Experience reviewing complex technical work, engineering simulations, computational models, or research outputs.
- Ability to evaluate engineering assumptions, numerical accuracy, solver convergence, and the reliability of computational results.
- Strong analytical judgment with the ability to identify technical errors, edge cases, and flawed engineering assumptions.
- Experience mentoring, reviewing, or leading small technical teams.
- Excellent written communication skills for providing precise technical feedback and documenting quality standards.
Nice to have
Show all 7 itemsHide these 7 items in Nice to have
- Experience with engineering simulation and computational tools such as OpenFOAM, SU2, CalculiX, Code_Aster, FEniCS, Elmer, Gmsh, FreeCAD, CadQuery, MuJoCo, ROS, XFOIL, AVL, OpenVSP, JSBSim, OpenMDAO, pyCycle, poliastro, Orekit, GMAT, or SPICE .
- Familiarity with commercial engineering software such as ANSYS, Abaqus, COMSOL, or NASTRAN , including reproducing workflows using open-source tools.
- Experience with state estimation, trajectory optimization, topology optimization, aeroelastic analysis, or multidisciplinary design optimization.
- Familiarity with Docker, Git, CI/CD pipelines, and automated testing .
- Experience developing or evaluating AI coding agents, terminal-based agents, or LLM-generated engineering solutions.
- Industry or agency experience in automotive, energy, manufacturing, robotics, aircraft, launch vehicles, satellites, or UAVs .
- Prior experience in AI training, technical quality control, benchmark development, or evaluation programs.
Quoted from selected sections of Turing's posting. The full posting may state other conditions. Read the full posting
A closer look
More context, when you need it.
Full job descriptionThe original posting, in Turing's words
Posted by Turing, reproduced here so you can judge the role before clicking. Original posting ↗
About Turing:
Turing is one of the world’s fastest-growing AI companies, accelerating the advancement and deployment of powerful AI systems.
Turing helps customers in two ways: Working with the world’s leading AI labs to advance frontier model capabilities in thinking, reasoning, coding, agentic behavior, multimodality, multilinguality, STEM and frontier knowledge; and leveraging that work to build real-world AI systems that solve mission-critical priorities for companies.
Role Overview:
We are seeking an experienced Mechanical or Aerospace Engineering expert to lead a team of technical trainers developing realistic, terminal-based engineering tasks for a frontier AI training and evaluation initiative.
In this role, you will oversee a pod of approximately 5–10 trainers, review engineering tasks for technical accuracy, reproducibility, and evaluation quality, and ensure that tasks reflect authentic mechanical and aerospace engineering workflows. You will also mentor trainers, maintain quality standards, and drive consistent task delivery.
What you'll do:
• Lead and mentor a pod of technical trainers, ensuring consistent quality, productivity, and timely delivery of engineering tasks.
• Review engineering tasks end to end, including problem statements, geometry and mesh files, simulation inputs, material properties, reference solutions, and automated tests.
• Validate tasks involving finite-element analysis (FEA), computational fluid dynamics (CFD), thermodynamics, heat transfer, dynamics, robotics, flight simulation, propulsion, and orbital mechanics .
• Ensure tasks reflect realistic mechanical and aerospace engineering workflows and require meaningful multi-step technical reasoning.
• Verify engineering correctness across units, equilibrium, conservation laws, boundary conditions, mesh convergence, solver tolerances, reference frames, and numerical stability.
• Validate computational environments, simulation tools, solvers, and dependencies to ensure reproducible results.
• Review automated graders to ensure they evaluate meaningful engineering outputs such as stresses, deflections, natural frequencies, aerodynamic coefficients, thermal performance, orbital parameters, and safety margins.
• Identify technical inaccuracies, unrealistic assumptions, incorrect tolerances, and opportunities to bypass engineering calculations or simulations.
• Provide clear, actionable technical feedback, track revisions, and ensure quality issues are resolved before task approval.
• Onboard trainers, allocate work, monitor quality and throughput, escalate blockers, and maintain technical documentation and best practices.
What we're looking for:
• Ph.D., postdoctoral experience, or equivalent advanced technical experience in Mechanical Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, or a closely related discipline.
• Strong programming skills in Python, C/C++, Fortran, Julia, or MATLAB/Octave , with proficiency in Linux environments.
• Hands-on expertise in at least one major area: FEA, CFD, dynamics, flight simulation, thermal modeling, astrodynamics, guidance, navigation and control (GNC), or propulsion modeling .
• Strong understanding of engineering simulation, numerical methods, computational modeling, and technical validation.
• Experience reviewing complex technical work, engineering simulations, computational models, or research outputs.
• Ability to evaluate engineering assumptions, numerical accuracy, solver convergence, and the reliability of computational results.
• Strong analytical judgment with the ability to identify technical errors, edge cases, and flawed engineering assumptions.
• Experience mentoring, reviewing, or leading small technical teams.
• Excellent written communication skills for providing precise technical feedback and documenting quality standards.
Nice to have:
• Experience with engineering simulation and computational tools such as OpenFOAM, SU2, CalculiX, Code_Aster, FEniCS, Elmer, Gmsh, FreeCAD, CadQuery, MuJoCo, ROS, XFOIL, AVL, OpenVSP, JSBSim, OpenMDAO, pyCycle, poliastro, Orekit, GMAT, or SPICE .
• Familiarity with commercial engineering software such as ANSYS, Abaqus, COMSOL, or NASTRAN , including reproducing workflows using open-source tools.
• Experience with state estimation, trajectory optimization, topology optimization, aeroelastic analysis, or multidisciplinary design optimization.
• Familiarity with Docker, Git, CI/CD pipelines, and automated testing .
• Experience developing or evaluating AI coding agents, terminal-based agents, or LLM-generated engineering solutions.
• Industry or agency experience in automotive, energy, manufacturing, robotics, aircraft, launch vehicles, satellites, or UAVs .
• Prior experience in AI training, technical quality control, benchmark development, or evaluation programs.
Offer Details:
• Commitments Required: At least 4 hours per day and minimum 40 hours per week with overlap of 4 hours with PST.
• Employment type : Contractor assignment (no medical/paid leave)
• Duration of contract : 4 week [expected start date is next week]
Working with TuringPay, getting started and work, from Turing's own pages
What the platform publishes in general. These are not extra terms confirmed for this particular role.
- Getting paid
- Paid monthly, around the 5th, straight to your bank account, or inside Deel on projects run through Deel. Its help articles disagree on whether that is the 5th calendar day or business day. help.turing.com/articles/9691407757-project-onboarding, help.turing.com/articles/6582454854-what-if-i-haven-t-rec..., help.turing.com/articles/1226770947-project-offboarding
- Before your first paid task
- A short application, with tests on some roles. Turing's review article says an interview is typically required for all roles. Onboarding covers the terms, ID verification with a driver's license or passport, and tax and payment details. help.turing.com/articles/2020987592-apply-for-jobs-at-turing, help.turing.com/articles/9179629201-how-long-does-the-app..., help.turing.com/articles/9691407757-project-onboarding
- How much work
- Review takes from 48 hours to 6 weeks after you finish applying, and the client makes the final choice. No reply within 6 weeks usually means you were not selected. help.turing.com/articles/9179629201-how-long-does-the-app..., help.turing.com/articles/2020987592-apply-for-jobs-at-turing
- Contract
- Depending on the project, the engagement rests on Turing's Terms of Service and a Service Agreement, on Deel, or on a partner that provides the contract. help.turing.com/articles/6582454854-what-if-i-haven-t-rec...
Read on the pages linked above on 23 Sep 2026. Platforms change these terms, so check the linked page before you rely on one.
How does the pay compare?Across Coding & software eval roles, not this role alone
From our own daily reads of every open listing on the platforms we follow, not from Turing's posting. How we count.
Pay across the field: Coding & software eval
Across 394 roles in this field with a stated hourly rate in US dollars, on 14 platforms, the middle half pays $65 to $120 an hour at the top of the range, and the median is $95.
| Platform | Roles | Top of range, per hour |
|---|---|---|
| Alignerr | 137 | $50 to $400 · median $100 |
| micro1 | 46 | $35 to $350 · median $110 |
| Handshake AI | 43 | $47 to $125 · median $80 |
| Meridial (Invisible) | 34 | $22 to $150 · median $60 |
| Mercor | 33 | $60 to $200 · median $105 |
Sources and listing historyWhere this information comes from
This listing's history
- First seen here on 9 Oct 2026, and still on Turing's list when we last read it on 13 Oct 2026.
- Posted by Turing
- First seen by AIPayList
- Last seen live
- Listing ID
- 111812
Keep exploring
More like this
Related field, different requirements. Check each role's own page before you apply.